Get the full picture with corporate wikis. Image: Las Vegas Sportsbook, Baishampayan Ghos, CC-BY-SA-2.0.
Continuing our comparison of BlueSpice MediaWiki and Confluence – with a short summary.
In this second part we concentrate on those functions aimed more at power users and administrators than at normal users. (Read here part 1 of our comparison)
Data analysis
BlueSpice and Confluence differ significantly in how they deal with metadata. Continue Reading
Sharing knowledge: One goal – different strategies. Image: Germany and Argentina face off in the final of the World Cup 2014 von Danilo Borges/copa2014.gov.br Licença Creative
In this two-part article, we give a detailed comparison of the wiki top dog MediaWiki and Confluence.
We already wrote a few words about MediaWiki and Confluence some years ago. At that time, we wrote about the main objections to MediaWiki.
That article is still worth reading and remains largely valid. Ultimately the key argument then was that the choice of tool did not depend only on features, but also on the concept behind the software. This is a timeless truth.
However, MediaWiki does not need to fear a direct feature comparison. Importantly, the enterprise distribution BlueSpice has already decided the feature question in my view. This can be seen on our newest internal feature-comparison table, published here and offered for free download: